Legal transformation advisory for law firms with tact.

Knowledge: Your Law Firm’s Most Powerful Asset – So Why Aren’t You Using It?

Every law firm claims that knowledge is its greatest asset – but most fail to actually use it. And when they finally acknowledge the issue? They buy another tool, without fixing the culture that prevents knowledge from being shared in the first place.

“Knowledge Management is key for driving change.”
– Darren Mitchell, Simmons & Simmons’ Chief Operating Officer (LexisNexis study, January 2025)

The Illusion of Knowledge Management

Law firms run on knowledge. It’s the foundation of every legal argument, the backbone of every client strategy, and the currency law firms trade in daily. Yet, despite its immense value, knowledge in law firms is often trapped, siloed, and underutilized. It sits locked away in individual minds, scattered across disconnected systems, or buried in endless email chains – out of reach when it’s needed most. Most firms treat their knowledge like an afterthought.

Think about it: how often do you find yourself digging through old emails, searching for that one precedent, or asking a colleague if they “remember that case” that might help? The knowledge exists. But can you find it when you need it? Can anyone else?

Would you confidently say that your firm’s knowledge collection is a true competitive asset? If knowledge is so essential to a law firm’s success, why is it still treated like a private asset rather than a collective advantage?

The Default Reaction: Buy a Knowledge Management Tool

When firms finally acknowledge their knowledge problem, the go-to solution is predictable:

  • Buy a shiny new knowledge management tool.
  • Spend months implementing it.
  • Realize no one is using it.
  • Watch the project quietly fade into obscurity.

The result? A costly system that never delivers its promised value – because it was never addressing the real issue in the first place. Because let’s be clear: this isn’t a technology problem. It’s a culture problem.

The Real Problem: A Culture That Resists Sharing

tact aims to getting down to where it hurts, to the source and turning it into long-term success. Because essentially we’re dealing with a serious paradox: why are law firms actively choosing not to share knowledge?

  • Because knowledge is the ultimate bargaining chip? If lawyers leave their firm, they take “their” knowledge – and their clients – with them.
  • Because billable hours still rule. If sharing knowledge isn’t billable, why prioritize it – especially if you’re the only one sharing?
  • Because lawyers don’t trust that investing in the firm’s collective success will benefit them personally in the long run?

Law firms love the idea of collaboration in theory but resist it in practice when it comes to knowledge management. The partnership model, which should be a structure of mutual investment, too often turns into a fragmented collection of self-interested realms. It seems that many partnerships do not actually believe that sharing knowledge will benefit them in the long run. The firm is seen as a vehicle for individual career, not as a collective entity that rewards shared success. And to be fair – this is where partnerships originally come from. It’s understandable.

So, What Kind of Partnerships Should We be Running?

Law firms operate as partnerships – a model built on collective ownership. In theory, that should mean that every partner is committed to strengthening the firm for the long haul. Yet, the way knowledge is (not) shared suggests otherwise.

If lawyers truly believed in their firms, knowledge-sharing would be second nature. Instead, many are hedging their bets, keeping valuable insights close, just in case they need an exit strategy.

The result? Firms keep throwing money at technology to “fix” knowledge management, without addressing the underlying issue: a culture that doesn’t reward collaboration. And when culture is the problem, no tool will ever be the solution. This isn’t a tech issue. It’s a mindset issue.

The Knowledge Crisis Is Already Here

The legal industry isn’t evolving in slow motion. It’s changing now. Alternative Legal Service Providers and tech-enabled competitors are already proving that legal work can be delivered differently – faster, cheaper, and with better access to collective knowledge.

The future of law isn’t some distant concept. It’s 5–8 years ahead, not decades away. If you’re a young partner today, you will face this dilemma – everywhere you go. So the real question is: Will you lead the change or become a casualty of it? Will you take charge of the culture shift now, or will you end up in a legal market where ALSPs, the knowledge shift, and The Closing Trust Gap leave traditional firms behind?

The Tough Questions Every Layer Must Answer

Will my firm still be competitive when AI and legal tech demand that firms actually use their collective knowledge?

Will my investment in my partnership be worth anything if your firm fails to transform?

What am I doing today to ensure that I don’t get caught in the same cycle of inefficiency and resistance?

Transformation Starts With Mindset, Not Software

Law firms don’t have a knowledge problem. They have a trust, leadership, and incentive problem.

Before you invest in the next big tech solution, take a step back. Fix the culture first. Create structures that encourage collaboration over competition. Build incentives that reward knowledge-sharing. Shift the mindset from knowledge as power to knowledge as collective strength.

Because transformation isn’t just about buying better tools. It’s about building better firms.

Culture Is Step One. Tech Is Step Two.

Foto von Pixabay / pexels.com

Related Posts